This is another massive Clinton Scandal: prominent Clinton supporter recently revealed that Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Election. Hillary Clinton, claimed that a study on the impact of alleged bias in Google searches has been “debunked” met with strong pushback from the recent revelations, a self-described Hillary supporter who has since issued a series of tweets defending his study and detailing how Clinton “has long depended on Google for both votes and money.”
An email that Leaked recently revealed that in 2014 Google’s Eric Schmidt offered to run Hillary’s tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office.”
“About 96% of 2016 campaign donations from Google employees went to Hillary. And Elan Kriegel, Hillary’s Chief Analytics Officer, credits his 2012 tech team, informally supervised by Eric Schmidt, for half of Obama’s win margin: nearly 2.5 million votes.”
Google has been manipulating elections for a long time and…but it did not stop President Trump from winning.
Taking references from findings in a report presented to Congress in July, Trump tweeted Monday that his victory over Hillary Clinton might have been “even bigger than thought” — if not for Google having “manipulated” millions of votes for Clinton, who lost by a significant number of electoral votes but won the popular vote by 2.9 million.
“Wow, Report Just Out! Google manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in 2016 Election!” Trump tweeted Monday (the study estimated as many as 10.4 million influenced). “This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than thought!”
Clinton responded by claiming the study was “debunked” and based only on responses from 21 undecided voters. “The debunked study you’re referring to was based on 21 undecided voters,” Clinton — who has blamed her loss on a variety of factors, many of which flirt with the conspiratorial — tweeted Monday. “For context that’s about half the number of people associated with your campaign who have been indicted.”
But the study’s author, psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein, who describes himself as having been a “strong” supporter of the Clintons for decades, isn’t taking Clinton’s “debunked” claim sitting down. In a series of posts, Epstein first defends his study then details the various connections between the 2016 Clinton campaign and Google (h/t Twitchy).
Epstein started by noting that Trump didn’t accurately summarize his findings (formatting revised for clarity): “I’ve never said that Google deliberately ‘manipulated’ the 2016 election, but I measured substantial pro-Hillary bias in Google’s search results by preserving & analyzing 13,207 election-related searches & the 98,044 web pages linked to those searches. The level of pro-Hillary bias I found in Google’s search results, absent on Bing & Yahoo was enough to convince between 2.6 & 10.4 million undecided voters to vote for Hillary. Donald Trump said 16 million; that is very wrong.”
It will do America a whole lot of good if Google is regulated or broken up. Google is working with Democrat party towards disenfranchising millions of American voters, illegally interfering in our elections, and turning our constitutional republic into a leftist Orwellian police state.
“A leaked email showed that in 2014 Google’s Eric Schmidt offered to run Hillary’s tech campaign (see pic). In 2015, Schmidt in fact funded The Groundwork, a highly secretive tech company, the sole purpose of which was to put Clinton into office.”